This is going to get us nowhere. Each one of us who is trying to make a difference, should be careful to what we degrade and call wrong, if we are to help open minds and teach what we feel works.
We are all passionate and motivated to bring a new way of thinking and a new way Science to the forefront. That way we can stop killing the planet and ourselves. But shouldn’t we live by example? Shouldn’t we plant seeds so that people may unfold into this available knowledge as they seem fit?
As a researcher, I am finding many different works using the same concepts, just differing language. Definitions and vocabulary. So I am trying to be very careful as to what I think is right or wrong. At times I have looked at something and said “pfff”, but ended up coming back to understand how it DOES fit.
Here is an example of what I mean:
I just watched a video “debunking” the Aether/Ether. This video just hones in on one view of the Ether theory and its description, which was held by only one group of scientists. This old theory was one using Ether particles. Then the video lumps in Tesla, Schauberger, and others. This is meant to polarize or make you choose sides and only buy into the theory they are pushing. When in actuallity the same people mentioned(Tesla,Schauberger), agree with the presenters information just at differing levels.
The term Aether/Ether was initially used by the likes of Boyle, Newton, and others in the 19th century to show the propagation of light. They needed a medium so they used the Ether. But there is a difference between the old Ether particle theory and Ether theories from others who, I feel, were closer to the truth.
Let’s take a quick look at a few people who also inspire me and how they do agree with my biggest inspiration, Walter Russell.
For starters, Russell used the word Ether in his first works and then the verbiage changed to Vacuum in the later works. He used it to describe the expansion end of the cycle or the return to stillness. The equilibrium from which it came.
Russell explains that there are invisible long slow nebulous waves/gases below hydrogen. These waves/elements fill up space and are all around us at different levels. They are grouped into octaves. We can only see a certain portion of the octaves with our perceptions.
What I am finding is that alot of the Ether theories are just referring to these lower octaves OR to the stillness of equilibrium. Space and Spirit, like Ether, can mean many different things. Some use it for Source, and some use it for a medium. We just need to understand the context. Not all of them think of it as a particle based Ether from long ago.
While I agree with the premise that these lower octaves are mostly what fills “space” that we can’t see, we have to remember that they are still motion. And many of the descriptions for the Ether resemble them. So you could liken the vacuum to the stillness but the lower octaves are still motion and not the vacuum that Russell refers to. But it doesn’t mean it is wrong IMO.
Here is some info in regards to the Ether from books I’ve found. Just a couple of snippets of their work.
So I just wanted to reach out and show everyone that we can’t be so rigid and absolute. Keep sharing this great info but lets not make it a religion like our current Scientific community does. People love to just share everything they see, so I think we should be responsible in what we put out there and what we try to teach.
The knowledge is available to us all and there are many messengers.
And remember… definition is everything.