A Further Report on the Russell Science Research – The World Balance Through Free Energy Project
Dr. Timothy A. Binder
Readers of Fulcrum are already familiar with the past demonstrations of transmutation that Ron
Kovac, Toby Grotz and myself have achieved and here is a brief summary of that work:
Working with one possible geometrical shape of the magnetic fields that Walter Russell
described in A New Concept of the Universe, we were able to apparently demonstrate the
transmutation of water vapor into fluorine and nitrogen as reported in Fulcrum, Vol. 1, #2. In
further unreported experiments, we succeeded in transmuting nitrogen into hydrogen and several
These experiments differed from what Russell described in that we were using vacuum tubes and
vapor as opposed to tubes with “a few millimeters of water” in them. We reasoned that Russell
must have had incredibly strong tubes to be able to withstand the tremendous pressures that
water heated to red hot temperatures would produce and that the same phenomena could be
produced under vacuum and in a plasma state with lower pressures.
Russell heated the tubes, thrust them into the magnetic field arrangement to cool down and from
the evidence of lab results achieved transmutation of water into nitrogen. Russell stated that he
achieved the transmutation of water into seventeen different results where, “in every case the
resultant gases differed”. By these means, he was able to vary the amounts of transmuted
hydrogen, oxygen and nitrogen.
Russell stated that by shifting the field arrangement and/or the polarity strengths he was able to
prolate or oblate the oxygen nucleus into nitrogen or hydrogen and vice versa. We found by
shifting the shapes of the magnetic fields with our “transmutator” after heating our gas samples
in the emission photospectrometer by running an electric current through the plasma and then
allowing the heated gas to cool down in our magnetic field arrangement, we were able to
demonstrate transmutations as identified by photo emission spectroscopy.
In June and July of 1994 with the funds that had been donated to the Russell Science Research
by Barbara Edwards and Frances Allison, Ron Kovac was able to assemble and bring on-line a
computerized mass spectrometer (CMS – also called a residual gas analyzer). This device gives
the most widely accepted irrefutable evidence for the transmutation experiments that we are
In July of 1994 after Ron had assembled the CMS we embarked upon a simple series of
experiments designed to show the transmutation of nitrogen gas plasma into hydrogen gas. We
were working with a different arrangement than used previously to shape the magnetic fields.
We knew that to go from nitrogen to hydrogen required a jump down from the fourth to the third
octave, and that this would likely mean a tremendous pressure change would be necessary and/or
As the experiments were being conducted, we had continuous monitoring of what was occurring
in the CMS by printed readout as well as a video recording of the sequence. What Ron later
observed on study of the data was truly amazing. In our first run, we had transmuted the nitrogen
gas plasma (14N) into helium4 (4He) and lithium5 (5Li) in the amounts of 3.75% and 2.5%,
respectively, from the parent nitrogen gas. The transmutation had occurred not when we
expected it to, namely after being heated and then allowed to cool down in the field, but simply
as the plasma was sitting in the field before any heating.
This was later repeated with the same results using the CMS and leaving the field arrangements
unchanged. This gives us more data to work with to establish the exact conditions necessary to
transmute any element into any other element. We will get more as we are able to do more
experiments and observe what different field conditions and temperatures produce.
Ron’s paper as printed in this issue describes the experiments we have done in terms of cold
fusion and in terms of Karl Gauss’s geometry. I will now comment on his descriptions and show
the relationship between Gauss’s and Russell’s geometries as I understand them.
First, let’s notice that the creation of lithium5 from nitrogen was remarkable from two aspects;
number one it was a transmutation of nitrogen into lithium which by conventional science is
impossible; the number two point is that 5Li is proclaimed by standard literature and science to
be non-existent. Before our July experiments, this particular atomic structure and mass of lithium
(5Li) was one of the missing links in the nucleonic tables; its existence had been predicted but
Transmutation of 14N to 5Li, a heretofore unseen and unknown isotope of lithium, is significant
for this research team in that there is no way the experimenters could have seeded or
contaminated their results. The results are indisputable and can be easily reproduced in any
Let’s also notice that the viewpoint in Ron’s article was craftily chosen and put in the language of
cold fusion terminology in an attempt to circumvent resistance to the view and language of
transmutation; and because cold fusion is where attention is focused in new energy research.
Thus, he begins his article saying that “the cold fusion process that gave these results uses only
plasma of N2 and magnetic shaping”. He immediately puts the reference box for the article in the
cold fusion arena rather than transmutation. He assumes that a cold fusion process occurs as we
created 4He which are the “common ashes of cold fusion”.
Ron cites the many different methods and materials that have been used to demonstrate cold
fusion in several very prominent research facilities since Fleischman and Pons did their first cold
fusion experiments in 1989 in Utah. He then makes the profound point throughout his article that
all of these many different processes are all functioning because of a common fundamental
feature: namely the “geometry of space bending”.
In Russell’s words, all there is to the material universe is motion in two basic directions: into and
away from a system center. These basic archetypes of motion create different gyroscopic forms
or variations on a vortex creating variations on nature’s two basic forms, the cube and the sphere,
male and female, respectively.
What Ron is pointing out is that all the various cold fusion processes are in their own fashion
working by engineering the bending of space or the formation of vortexual motion focusing heat
and light in the center of the system and radiating that intense tightly wound up motion back out
as energy (heat of cold fusion) or mass of elemental transmutation via the vortex equatorial
plane. This latter manifestation is identical to our sun or any solar system generating heat and
baby planets out of itself by way of the equatorial plane. See pp. 223-230 of The Universal One
for Russell’s description of this universal phenomenon.
In Ron’s toroid knot analogy, he says that energy is expressed by unraveling the knot back out
the central (polar) axis and matter is expressed by leaving the knot system at 90° or right angles
to the central axis.
This appears to me to be dissimilar to Russell’s cosmogony in that energy and mass increase by
way of the polar central axis in centripetal direction and they both decrease by way of the
equatorial axis through centrifugal motion. Russell says the knot is wound up by the north-south
charging poles and unwinds via the east-west discharging equatorial poles. He does not allow the
knot to unwind in the same axis that it winds up in. He says that the direction of winding when it
reverses is now not the central axis anymore, but the equatorial axis that is at 90° to the central
axis. When this unwinding process reaches its end at cube wave field boundaries it then reverses
direction and potential and becomes a polar central winding up axis. Russell says that matter and
energy turn inside-out and outside in.
If we understand Ron’s unraveling of the knot through the central axis to mean what I have stated
as Russell’s cosmogony, only then are they congruent. This is why in Russell’s diagrams of wave
motion he shows both pairs of spirals winding and unwinding within each other, which Ron has
shown on page 28 of his article in a similar way where he has a pseudosphere and catenoid
superimposed on each other. Here, I interpret the pseudosphere to be the wind up spiral motion
and the catenoid the unwinding spiral motion with the toroid knot representing the mass
formation and the spirals of pseudosphere-catenoid geometry representing the space that is
becoming matter or matter that is becoming space.
Ron makes the salient point that none of the materials that the various researchers have used are
essential. The only essential is what Ron is calling “the bending of space geometry”. The
“bending of space geometry” is a vortex motion controlled by electric potential fields that
science calls magnetic and electric fields that curve low potential motion in a centripetal
direction to form density and high potential and curve high potential motion in a centrifugal
direction to form tenuity and low potential. This process is a focusing and unfocusing of light-
motion. When seen in this light, all the various successful cold fusion experiments can be
understood to function on this basis. All the unsuccessful experiments, or those that start and
then heretofore inexplicably stop, are now understood in terms of the successful or not successful
bending of space geometry or vortex formation. For example, if the surface of a metal used in the
experiment is not conditioned properly to maximize the holes in it that guide the vortex, there
will be no reaction; or if the intense heat generated in the hole by the vortex melts the metal and
fuses the hole shut and so on to fusing all shut, then the reaction will stop. The point is to create a
vortex and control it.
With our quartz plasma tube and electrodes at each end and externally focused magnetic fields,
we were able to generate this geometry of space bending or vortex formation in such a way that
we changed the vortex motion of nitrogen (14N) to the vortex motion of 5Li and 4He. The final
quantitative analysis (performed by measuring and comparing the relative peak heights on the
CMS charts) of the first processing showed 2.5% 5Li, 3.75% 4He and the remaining 93.75% as
untransformed nitrogen. When we reprocessed the same tube, the percentage of 5Li went to
6.5%. This was done with little temperature change, and if temperatures were modified, we
might have vastly increased the amounts of transmuted lithium and helium.
Ron says that what we had done was a cold fusion process, although we did not measure any
excess heat released, even though it may have occurred. At least part of his basis for claiming
that it was cold fusion was because of the common hall mark of cold fusion in the appearance of
4He. It is worth mentioning that many different transmutations have been observed in cold
fusion experiments even though transmutation was not the purpose of the experiment, much as
we observed the creation of 5Li in an unexpected way from our experiment.
Our future experiments need to quantify any excess heat production (or even possible cooling),
pressure changes, mass balances, and beta, alpha and neutron particle emission as vortex motion
quantity and quality are changed in direction and degree.
If we did achieve the observed results through a fusion process as conventionally understood, we
should be able to show the reactant pathways. For example, 100% 14N + magnetic fields f
93.75% 14N + 3.75% 4He + 2.5% 5Li by what mechanics and geometrical transformation?
Since all we had was nitrogen gas and magnetic field shaping and ended up with two additional
elements, we cannot really call it a cold fusion process as there were not two elements that could
be fused to form a new one as in conventional thinking. Rather, we had one state of motion
identified as nitrogen that was changed to some amount of two new states of motion.
The vortex known as nitrogen was subject to an external magnetic field vortex (what Russell
calls an electric field) that changed some of the nitrogen vortexes to other shaped vortexes or
from a gyroscope spinning in the plane of nitrogen to those spinning in the planes of 5Li and
Ron explains the cold fusion and transmutation processes in terms of Karl Gauss’s pseudospherecatenoid
geometry determining the bending of space to form what Ron then calls toroid knots.
Let’s again look at these ideas and geometries and see further how Russell described all of them
in his cosmogony.
To me the pseudosphere appears to correspond to the centripetally winding up male
preponderance integrating vortex, and the catenoid corresponds to the centrifugally unwinding
female preponderance disintegrating vortex. The toroid knot corresponds to the more or less
spherical form at the center of mass formation, the atomic nucleus of modern science that Russell
describes as varying forms of prolating and oblating spheres, the true sphere being a special case
known as carbon. The prolating spheres are formed from rings winding up by being thrust
inward centripetally to eventually close a hole at the center to form a sphere at the carbon
element wave amplitude position standing upright gyroscopic plane position. Oblating spheres
are formed as rings are centrifugally projected outward from the system center, forming
gradually bigger holes in the former spheres center, as the gyroscope spins slower and lies down
through the third, second and first locking point potential positions.
In Russell’s cosmogony, the two centripetal vortices spin in the same direction if you look at
each base to assess the spin direction. In this way, they pull or are thrust into each other or create
a high potential gravity center with heat. The centrifugal spirals that exit at 90° to this high
potential-heat center spin in the same direction as their parent spirals, one going one way and its
pair the other way if you consider their spin direction from their mutual base or the same way if
you look at the spin from their apexes.
Fulcrum editor Chester Hatstat has suggested another analogy to explain this motion that further
clarifies the toroid knot analogy. He says why not think of the two centripetal vortices as joining
apex to apex and heated at that point which will make them more malleable and subject to
expansion. If you blow into both or either base end of the vortex spirals, the common heated
center will expand in a balloon like, toroid, or spheroid fashion. Why not indeed? This is what
happens at the center of the vortex. The center of the cyclone is where things are hot and
malleable and cannot stay compressed into form and thus expand centrifugally outward to cool.
Ron gives us an interesting and useful gravity mechanics in the form of two hoses in an
aquarium pumping water out. These two hoses each represent atomic mass systems. The faster
the pump works the more mass it will demonstrate. Two such pumps in proximity tend to attract
each other if their mutual charging vortexes align. If we go on and notice that instead of aligning
charging (sucking or vacuum) vortexes, we align their discharging (pushing or pressure)
vortexes, which is where the other end of the hoses are discharging under thrusting pressure
rather than intake, vacuum or charging vacuum, they will mutually repel. This is an application
of Bernoulli’s theorem about water pressure in a pipe used as more than an analogy to describe
gravity mechanics as it is a real model of gravity mechanics. See my answers to questions article
about gravity mechanics and Bernoulli’s theorem for a description of this model. Anything that
demonstrates attraction and repulsion demonstrates gravity by the whole of the Russell
In this way we can see how gravity as a whole process as exhibited in a universal systems model
called the vortex demonstrates an inward thrust (or pull depending on point of view) and an
outward thrust (or again a pull depending on point of view). Attraction and repulsion between
two entities are thus seen to be dependent in part on vortex alignment. Other factors influencing
attraction and repulsion include all other seventeen dimensions described in The Universal One.
The dimension corresponding to what I am describing as vortex alignment appears to me to be
plane of rotation. It is Russell’s view that understanding this alignment of vortex gyroscopic
planes of motion is crucial to successful demonstration of transmutations and is an essential
mechanical explanation for the underlying modus operandi as he stated in A New Concept Of
The Universe on pages 90, 91, & 129.
Ron describes toroid knot formation in an easily understandable way for us by the analogy of
winding up a rubber band to form knots in the center. This rubber band winding is the space
bending of motion in the geometry of the pseudosphere that Karl Gauss described to form mass
and is the same centripetally directed motion to the gravity center of a system and mass
formation that Russell described as the appearance of matter in variations of spherical-cubical
forms with the true sphere and true cube as special cases.
Ron goes on to describe that this tightly wound toroid (centripetally bound and compressed)
mass can then either unwind back through its axis (as it turns inside-out) as energy production
(heat, electricity and/or light), or it can unwind equatorially as a catenoid spiral in secondary
mass formation to form various elements. Thus we see mass-energy transformations occurring
again as in Russell’s descriptions of motion to and from wave field cube wall boundaries to and
from mass spherical center boundaries.
As motion is progressively wound up along the centripetally directed polar axis, we witness
increasing density and potential for mass transformations in the form of heat and light. As
motion reverses to centrifugality and is spun out in decreasing speed from wave field-mass
centers, we witness matter frozen into form and the ever decreasing potential for mass
transformations in the form of heat and light as the mass is released into lower potential and
lower potential fields as heat and light along the path of its journey.
Mass transformation are a result of the accumulation and redistribution of mass-energy, or they
result from a change in the condition of motion to or away from a system center or change of
direction of motion. Any mass as it is centrifugally directed to lower pressure zones expresses
and radiates electromagnetic (EM) energy becoming cooler, dimmer and of lower voltage as it
expands centrifugally outward from its system center and vice-versa. An atomic system (any
system) leaks or sputters out various amounts of EM energy as it converts wound up potential
into these expressions of energy-motion. The centripetal winding increases the potential of and
for electric pressure, light and heat prior to, during and after the atom jumps to the next locking
point position, and vice-versa as it jumps to the next lower locking point position. It would
appear that the same process occurs as motion-matter jumps up or down an octave just as it does
jumping up or down from one locking point to the next within the same octave. The time element
in going from octave to octave as well as pressures, etc. would be significantly greater than from
one locking point to another in the same octave. All expressions of motion exhibit endo- or exothermic
The various charts in Ron’s article show the actual measurements done by the CMS of the
experiments. There is a standard specs of the nitrogen gas and then the specs showing the
appearance of 4He & 5Li. The top CMS chart on page 22 shows there was no contamination of
the nitrogen with lithium or with helium before subjecting it to the magnetic field vortex shaping
All the research that we have done to date has validated Walter Russell’s basic concepts. The
University is actively seeking more funding to continue this vital research. With sufficient
funding to put Ron, Toby, and other scientists I have in mind to work on this research and
development full time, we should be able to produce new non polluting and sustainable energy
sources and materials and help provide the physical basis for a peaceful civilization. The
attention that should be focused on the Russell cosmogony as a result of continued physical
demonstration of the cosmogony in new energy sources, materials and products would also focus
more attention on the spiritual nature of the Russell cosmogony and guide us to transforming all
of our institutions towards balance, sustainability and peace.
Dr. Timothy A Binder
A REPORT ON THE RUSSELL SCIENCE RESEARCH TEAM’S
TRANSMUTATION OF NITROGEN INTO
LITHIUM AND HELIUM
by Ron Kovac
The following article, written by Ron Kovac, reports on the results of what the Russell Science
Research (RSR) Colorado team of Ron Kovac, Toby Grotz, and Dr. Timothy Binder refer to as
the 5Li experiment. The 5Li experiment is the second generation transmutation research
experiment conducted by the RSR Colorado team. Ordinary nitrogen (14N: nitrogen with atomic
#7 and atomic mass 14) was successfully transformed into 5Li (lithium with atomic #3 and
atomic mass 5) and 4He (helium with atomic #4 and atomic mass 4)!
In 1927, Dr. Walter Russell successfully converted water to 14.9% hydrogen, 16.0% oxygen, and
69.1% nitrogen (see A New Concept of the Universe, p. 130 and Fulcrum V1, #2). In 1992-1993,
the RSR Colorado team verified Dr. Walter Russell’s transmutation concepts when they
produced fluorine from water vapor. The results of the RSR Colorado team’s 1992/1993 first
generation transmutation experiments were published in Fulcrum, Vol. 1, #2.
The first generation experiment utilized water injected evacuated quartz tubes which were
subsequently heated, placed in magnetic fields, allowed to cool while in the magnetic field, and
then qualitatively analyzed with an emission spectroscope. The externally applied magnetic
fields established shaped potential gradients within the quartz tubes that, according to Russell
Cosmogony – dual-polarity control – gyroscopic plane of rotation concepts, would
reshape/reconfigure the atoms centripetal/centrifugal vortices to produce the appearance of a
different atom – transmutation!
The second generation experiments utilized nitrogen injected evacuated quartz tubes. These
tubes are internally fit with electrodes to produce an internal electric field and with a perforated
glass partition (frit) to introduce a vortexian shape to the electric field. External magnetic fields
were also used to further define and shape the internal nitrogen plasma vortex fields.
In an addendum to Ron Kovac’s report, Dr. Binder elaborates on the concepts and principles
from the Russell Cosmogony that are evidenced in the 5Li experiment. Fulcrum has the honor of
being the first to publish the results of these revelatory experiments which were first announced
at this past September’s USP Homecoming. We can now expect the scientific community to
finally recognize the Russell Cosmogony and pray for the peaceful and immediate application of
Dr. Russell’s concepts into business, industry, and our everyday lives. Our civilization now has
the tools to live peaceably and sustainably!
PLASMA SHAPING REVEALS NEW ATOMIC TRANSFORMATION
TECHNIQUE AN D COLD FUSION AT CHEMICAL – MOLECULAR LEVELS
by Ron J. Kovac
To establish reader interest, the author announces the following conclusion of this paper: 4He
(the commonly accepted ashes of cold fusion) was obtained at 3.75% concentration of the parent
gas, nitrogen (14N). Even more profound: THE “MISSING LINK” element, 5Li was created in
the same apparatus. Standard literature (see p. 23) proclaims that there is no element of atomic
weight 5. The cold fusion process that gave these results uses only plasma of N2 and magnetic
shaping. The plasma tube has no constrictions or capillary fusion facility. The plasma tube has
only two needle point stainless steel electrodes, no platinum, nickel or palladium cathodes. The
5Li was obtained at 2.50% level of the parent gas 14N.
The creation of this never before found element (the long sought missing element of the periodic
or nucleonic tables) is offered by the author as a strong support for the notion that cold fusion,
ultra sub-atomic particles, gravity, electricity, and magnetism are each only a consequence of
space moving in special interrelated geometric formations. If glass, rarefied nitrogen and
electricity or magnetism can cause cold fusion (4He “ashes” – see p. 21) and transmute or create
the new missing element 5Li (see pp. 21-22), then only geometry of motion of space is involved.
The history began with the Fleischman-Pons type cell drawn below. The construction and
components of this cell inspire fusion thinking because of the heavy water (D2O) and exotic
metal elements. But later work shown at the end of this report indicates almost any materials can
be used to cause “cold fusion”. Randell Mills and Stephen Kniezys noticed you do not need
heavy water, ordinary water would do with the addition of potassium salts. Dutch Shell
discovered you don’t need water or palladium, and that stainless steel and regular hydrogen
would even work in a spark chamber arrangement. Here we see a clue that maybe this effect is
much broader in scope than a simple nuclear explanation. After all, the more information we get
the more classical fusion seems to fail as an explanation. Perhaps our perception of classical
fusion theory was too narrow in scope. Maybe this was a consequence of the fact that our test
instruments were based on detecting fast moving particles more than particles at rest. (Geiger
counters, scintillation counters, etc. require the particle move through the medium of the detector
leaving a trail of ionization. Likewise, cloud chamber, bubble chamber, etc.) What about the
particles that might have a very slow velocity, kind of floating around, not causing any
disturbance, but available for molecular or atomic interaction?
“To catch a polar bear you must go north and cut a hole in the ice. Then you must put little green
peas around the hole. When you see the polar bear come up to the location and bend over to take
a pea, you rush up behind him (or her) and kick him (or her) in the ice hole.” Don’t try this since
it is not true! The truth is a polar bear can smell a human 20 miles away. There will be no
sneaking up on a polar bear until its time! (source: Hal and Charlie Show, “Fun Facts”, 630 on
your AM radio dial, July ’94, Boulder CO.)
On this cold fusion, what we need is a polar bear nose that can smell the slow moving particles.
In this way, we can get the whole picture, not just special cases. GOOD NEWS: we have one! It
is a machine like a bookkeeper with a third eye! It is called a QUADRAPOLE MASS
SPECTROMETER, …. A.K.A……. a residual gas analyzer (RGA). Unfortunately, again, only the
wealthy can afford the device. Fortunately, a person is only limited by their creative ability. In
this manner, I was able to pull in favors, extort people, recycle parts, and otherwise behave in
such a manner too despicable and incriminating to mention here until I had created the
mechanical atrocity pictured on the cover of this issue of Fulcrum. In spite of its appearance and
the age of some of its components, the Mass Spec or RGA works well
Computer printouts of the RGA appear on pages 21 & 22. Page 21 shows the first experiment
and the appearance of 4He and 5Li. The top of page 22 shows an analysis of the N2 bottled gas
verifying the absence of any 5Li, and the bottom of page 22 shows the result after processing a
sample through the fields twice, note the lines at atomic mass 5 (5Li) and at atomic mass 14
(14N). The relative heights of the lines represent relative quantities.
In addition, two types of emission spectrometers were employed. The first was a Varian 175
atomic absorption spectrophotometer with custom parts added to facilitate its use as an emission
spec. The second is an energy inventory device for 360 lambda to 800 lambda wavelength. The
second might lead to photovoltaic interfacing info. Transmutation indication was evident from
earlier experiments with Toby Grotz and Dr. Tim Binder using these devices (see Fulcrum V1,
The late physics nobel Laureate Julian Schwinger of UCLA predicted the creation of 5Li from
cold fusion. Ironically, in 182, Karl Gauss postulated a simple geometry which explains gravity, electricity,
magnetism, sub-atomic structure (from which the Sommerfield fine structure constant can be
derived) and which explains the catenoid and pseudosphere geometry involved in matter
Walter Russell from 1926 to 1960 was describing the same geometry of motion and, as a world
class architect, sculptor and painter, left a very clear record of what he called The Wave of
I presented a paper reporting on the success of emission spectroscopy plasma experiments which
supported the ideas of Gauss and Russell at the 1994 International Symposium on New Energy,
Denver, CO. At that time, I promised to follow up the work with a mass spec. or RGA which
gives more definitive data. This paper reports on the follow up (i.e., the application of Gauss and
Russell ideas to gravity and cold fusion, with the addition of TOROID KNOT IDEA which is my
It is this author’s opinion that plasma shaping simulates the space bending described by Gauss
and Russell as it applies to cold fusion and assume the plasma rotates and compresses like the
rubber band of a toy airplane as you continue to wind the propeller. At first you get only a spiral
catenoid shaped rubber band. If you continue to put motion into the system by continuing to
wind the rubber band, the wound rubber band starts to form “knots” in the windings. The author
claims that this knot is like a toroid at the center of the rubber band (catenoid), and that this knot,
by analogy, represents the formation of ultra sub-atomic particles which radiate their energy as
electromagnetic force or coalesce into the sub-atomic particles of today’s classical atomic
physics. The toroids of fast moving, tightly compressed or wound space have the option of
axially radiating energy or continuing the toroid motion (as mass). Either way, more space is
consumed by compression at that location (the center of mass). As more space rushes in to fill
the void left by the winding/compression, a flow of space to the center of mass is created. As this
flow of space rushes past nearby mass, it pushes that center of mass towards the first center of
In this way, the flow of space to the centers of mass becomes gravity between the centers of
mass. The weight of any atom group per unit volume then would be related to what rate that
group creates space bending (or consumption of space motion). Two flexible rubber hoses
submerged in the water of a fish aquarium, each having a separate pump at the other end of the
hose, would pump water out of the tank at different rates depending on how fast each pump was
running and the diameter of each hose. Both hose ends (ideally) would end up sucking the other
end into itself (like gravity attraction) which is really the water flow pushing the hose ends
together. The hose with the faster pump would be causing faster flow, have more pull, and by
analogy would have more weight per unit volume (assuming the hoses were the same diameter).
With regard to cold fusion, the author simply put the toroid complexes back into the hostile
space bending location where they could unravel (radiate energy) into their neighbor or borrow
energy from their neighbor unraveling to cause whatever net energy consumption or radiation
and transformations. This changing is only possible at low net energy levels of cold fusion if the
proper space bending (squeezing together of the toroids – torquing the toroids with space motion
nearby) is present. The space bending can be accomplished by the physical boundary imposition
of the inside walls of a microscopic cavity on the surface of a catalytic metal like Ni, Fe, Pd, Pt,
etc.. This space bending can be accomplished any number of ways yet to be discovered, like the
magnetic fields of the author’s device or the capillary walls of the author’s glass frit fusion cell
(of the May ’94 New Energy Symposium) or the ceramic sintered frit of the Japan device.
Remember, a sintered frit might be a proton conductor but it also has a capillary hole surface.
The MAIN POINT IS THAT EACH DESIRED CHANGE HAS A SPECIFIC GEOMETRY OF
SPACE BENDING TO ACHIEVE THAT CHANGE. The math associated with the Karl Gauss
geometry is presented in Winter ’94, 21st Century by Lawrence Hecht. The geometry envisioned
by Walter Russell is available through the University of Science and Philosophy, Swannanoa,
A spark hitting a stainless target like the Shell device can create a capillary dent and the required
magnetic field to initiate the space flow of the proper geometry to cause available hydrogen to
undergo cold fusion. The number of dents would be easy to regulate as would the cold fusion as
would the life and output of the cell.
In all this, the unique contribution of the author is the toroidal knot idea added to Russell/Gauss
geometry along with experimental evidence, which until now was not available. The author’s
experiments show a cold fusion cell does not need water, metal, or even electricity for ion
transport. The author’s cold fusion cell used only a gas and magnetism to create 5Li. This does
not mean a plasma or electricity wouldn’t help. It simply means the geometry of space bending is
the fundamental mechanism. It is fascinating to think the latest photos from the Hubble telescope
(called a new mystery) of object 1987-A could be explained in the same way. This is also true of
the new laser star telescope photos of the ORION nebula. Both of these objects show proper
geometry as well as proper toroid location, as well as proper energy radiation direction to agree
with this theory.